The US military's recent actions in its 'war on drugs' have led to significant casualties and raised serious questions about the legality of these operations. According to the US Southern Command, strikes on alleged drug-carrying vessels resulted in the deaths of five individuals. But here's where it gets controversial: The exact locations of these strikes haven't been disclosed, but they're part of a broader campaign targeting vessels suspected of smuggling narcotics in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific over the past three months.
This recent event follows another strike a day prior, where the US targeted what it described as a 'narco-trafficking convoy,' resulting in at least three fatalities. The Trump administration has framed these operations as a non-international armed conflict against alleged traffickers. However, legal experts are scrutinizing these actions, suggesting potential violations of the laws governing such conflicts.
Since the beginning of the 'war on drugs,' there have been over 30 strikes on vessels. This has resulted in the deaths of more than 110 people since the initial attack on September 2nd. And this is the part most people miss: The initial attack on September 2nd has drawn particular attention, especially from lawmakers. It was revealed that US forces struck the targeted boat twice. Survivors of the first strike were killed in the second. This 'double-tap' strike has sparked concerns, with some lawmakers suggesting it may have violated the rules of engagement.
In a statement regarding the December 30th strike, the Southern Command mentioned survivors but didn't specify the exact number. They reported that the remaining individuals abandoned the other vessels. The US Coast Guard was immediately notified to search for the survivors. An anonymous US official informed Reuters that eight survivors were being sought. It remains unclear if any have been found.
Adding to the complexity, the US has yet to provide concrete evidence that the targeted boats were carrying drugs. Despite this, the Southern Command maintains that intelligence confirmed the vessels were traveling along known narco-trafficking routes and engaged in such activities.
What do you think about the military's actions? Do you believe these strikes are justified, or do they cross legal boundaries? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
